Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Robin Bertrand vs Daniel Little Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bertrand vs Little analysis and find out who is favored!
Robin Bertrand vs Daniel Little Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bertrand 1 - 0 Little
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bertrand has won 52.86% of points on their second serve, while Little has won 48.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bertrand, in recent form, has won 54.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Little has won 51.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.6% and 29.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bertrand has saved 56.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Little has saved 63.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bertrand has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 63/ 33), with Little winning 42.31% (W/L 11/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bertrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 149/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 13/ 22). Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Bertrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.95% of matches (W/L 53/ 25), where as Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bertrand winning 1 times and Little being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bertrand winning 2 and Little winning 1. The last match between Bertrand and Little was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 22-07-2021, Second, Hard with Robin Bertrand getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bertrand and Little have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bertrand winning 1 times and Little 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bertrand winning 0, and Little 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bertrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.7 while Little has played against players with an average rank of 94.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bertrand has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Little has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bertrand has converted 42.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Little has converted 45.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
303
Rank
303
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
564
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
61% (181-114)
Career Total W/L
56% (98-76)
71% (32-13)
YTD W/L
54% (7-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Robin Bertrand | Daniel Little |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (72/108) | 49% (37/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (48/72) | 70% (26/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (15/36) | 47% (18/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (31/75) | 42% (45/108) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Robin Bertrand
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Robin Bertrand | Daniel Little |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (32/13) | 54% (7/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (69/35) | 52% (14/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (520/416) | 53% (135/121) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (29/8) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.58 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 72 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 122 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:24 | 1:29:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 278.04 | 60.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1930/2963) | 60% (479/805) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1292/1930) | 73% (351/479) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (552/1033) | 48% (157/326) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (159/380) | 46% (28/61) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1361/3134) | 37% (292/780) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (26/10) | 54% (7/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (31/44) | 54% (7/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (9/15) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (29/25) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (29/4) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (16/6) | 14% (7/1) |
Robin Bertrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Robin Bertrand
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
71 of
97)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Egor Gerasimov
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Giles Hussey
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Bogdan Bobrov
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Robin Bertrand
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Saba Purtseladze
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
6
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Robin Bertrand
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Filip Peliwo
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Joshua Charlton
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
12
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Mason Naumovski
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Jimmy Yang
40%
(
23 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bertrand Vs Little Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
